Carbullido

(PC) Taylor v. Carbullido

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20232:19-cv-02550California1,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:19-cv-2550 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. CARBULLIDO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915A(a), the court is required to screen pleadings filed by prisoners. During screening, this court found that plaintiff could proceed “on a claim arising under the First Amendment against defendants Hodgers and Carbullido with respect to plaintiff’s allegations that they refused to permit plaintiff to solicit representation of counsel via a private telephone call.” ECF No. 18. On March 24, 2021, the district court judge assigned to this case agreed that this action would proceed on the claim identified above and dismissed all other defendants and claims. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to the claim. In the motion, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.