CDCR

(PC) Trujillo v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20232:23-cv-01531California1,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY TRUJILLO, Case No. 2:23-cv-01531-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, represented by counsel, brings this case against defendants under section 1983 for violation of his civil rights, under the Rehabilitation Act, and under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). ECF No. 1 at 3-7. His allegations are insufficient to meet federal pleading standards. I will grant plaintiff leave to amend so that he may correct the deficiencies in his complaint.

27 28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.