Cates

(PC) Ray v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20231:22-cv-01504California2,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., No. 1:22-cv-01504-ADA-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND

BRIAN CATES, et al., ORDERING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE Defendants. (ECF Nos. 2, 8)

FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Edward Vincent Ray, Jr., (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS On March 9, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and require Plaintiff to pay the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 2, 8.) The Court found that Plaintiff had at least three “strikes” prior to filing this 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.