Cupp

Cupp v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20232:16-cv-00523California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EDWARD CUPP and No. 2:16-cv-00523-TLN-KJN

LAWRENCE HAVEN,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

ROB BONTA,

15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs James Edward Cupp and Lawrence Haven’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 112.) Defendant Rob Bonta (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 114.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 115.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit on March 11, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) Since then, Plaintiffs have amended five times. (See ECF Nos. 5, 12, 65, 80, 83.) The Court has dismissed portions of Plaintiffs’ action five times. (See ECF Nos. 58, 59, 60, 61, 79.) Plaintiffs filed the operative FAC on November 20, 2020. (ECF No. 83.) In response, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on December 4, 2020. (ECF No. 84.) On September 28, 2021, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss without leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.