Pfeffer

(PC) Mills v. Pfeffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20231:20-cv-00195California2,901 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL RAY MILLS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00195-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS

AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

C. PFEFFER, et al.,

Defendants. (Doc. 29)

16 21-DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on February 7, 2020. (Doc. 1.) The complaint named as defendants the warden and 11 correctional officers, sergeants, and lieutenants at Kern Valley State Prison. (Id. at 1-4.) Plaintiff also named three individuals associated with the Anti-Recidivism Coalition (“ARC”). On October 18, 2020, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 13.) The Court held Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. First, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.