(PC)Arteaga

(PC)Arteaga v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20231:22-cv-01292California9,427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSE O. ARTEAGA, Case No. 1:22-cv-01292-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH

AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST

J. GARCIA, et al., DEFENDANTS J. GARCIA AND FUGATE

FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE, PLAINTIFF’S

14 Defendants. EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT DOE FOR FAILURE TO

PROTECT, AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

17 (ECF No. 1).

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

21 22 Jose O. Arteaga (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 23 this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this 24 action on October 11, 2022. (ECF No. 1). 25 The Court screened the complaint and found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.