(PC) Hill v. Corcoran State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20231:23-cv-00870California925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’VAUGHN CORTEZ HILL, Case No. 1:23-cv-00870-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

13 v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

14 CORCORAN STATE PRISONER, et al., ORDERS AND PROSECUTE 15 Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

17 D’Vaughn Cortez Hill (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On August 21, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff fails 20 to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 13). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to either 1) file 21 an amended complaint or 2) file a notice stating that he wants to stand on this complaint and have 22 it reviewed by a district judge. (Id., p. 8). The Court’s screening order also stated that “[f]ailure to 23 comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.