Shute

(PC) Jones v. Shute

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20232:22-cv-01384California858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELL JONES, No. 2:22-cv-1384 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHELLE SHUTE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment when they failed to provide timely treatment for a back condition. On May 5, 2023, this court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order (“DSO”). (ECF No. 24.) Among other things, that order informed the parties that responses to discovery requests were due forty-five days after the requests were served. Defendants have filed a motion to compel plaintiff to respond to discovery. (ECF No. 27.) Defendants state that on July 3, they sent plaintiff Requests for Production of Documents and Requests for Admissions. Pursuant to the DSO, plaintiff’s responses were due by August //// //// //// 21.1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.