Pfeiffer

(PC) Thompson v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20231:20-cv-01619California393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAHN GREGORY THOMPSON, No. 1:20-cv-01619 ADA GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RETURN OF ALL EXHIBITS

C. PFEIFFER, et al., (ECF No. 35) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting that the court return all exhibits that he mailed to the court in October of 2020. ECF No. 35 at 2. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. First, a review of the record indicates that Plaintiff’s complaint was filed in this matter on October 21, 2020. ECF No. 1 at 14. It was then docketed on November 16, 2020. No exhibits were attached to the complaint. See generally ECF No. 1. Next, even if Plaintiff is mistaken with respect to the date any exhibits were filed, none of the documents Plaintiff filed in 2020 have exhibits attached to them. See ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4

The signing date of a pleading is the earliest possible filing date pursuant to the mailbox rule. 26 See Roberts v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.