Hall

(PC) Randolph v. Hall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20231:20-cv-01434California1,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:20-cv-01434-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

v. COUNSEL

HALL, et al., (Doc. 27)

Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

RESUBMIT COPY OF EXHIBIT D TO HIS

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Hall and Isais on 19 Plaintiff’s claims of First Amendment retaliation.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

21 On September 11, 2023, Defendants Hall and Isais filed a motion for summary judgment 22 addressing the merits of Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 23.) 23 On October 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the summary judgment motion in a 24 document titled “Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment; Request for 25 Appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.