Pheiffer

(PC) Singh v. Pheiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20231:22-cv-01412California577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01412-ADA-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED WARDEN PHEIFFER, et al., (ECF Nos. 9 & 28). Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

16 Michael Manjeet Singh (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on May 27, 2022. (ECF No. 9). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 28). The Court found that only the following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims for excessive force against Defendants Veith and Fowler, Eight Amendment claims for failure to protect and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendants Veith, Fowler, and Diaz, and state law claims for negligent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.