(PC)Lindsey

(PC)Lindsey v. People of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20231:23-cv-01078California929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGJUAN DONNELL LINDSEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-01078-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

13 v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ORDERS AND PROSECUTE

CALIFORNIA, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

Defendants. ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 17 Regjuan Donnell Lindsey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff fails to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 10). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to either 1) file an amended complaint or 2) file a written notice stating that he wants to stand on this complaint and have it reviewed by a district judge. (Id., p. 11). The Court’s screening order also stated that “[f]ailure to comply with this order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.