(HC) Potter v. State of Idaho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ONIS CARRABINE POTTER, No. 2:23-cv-2136 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND STATE OF IDAHO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a Sacramento County Jail pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. Petitioner claims that he is being held on a warrant originating from Idaho and is the subject of…