Merritt

(PC) Maldanado v. Merritt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20231:23-cv-00482California2,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCIAZ MALDANADO, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00482-JLT-SKO PC Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

L. MERRITT, et al., PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 12)

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHIN 21 DAYS

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

20 Plaintiff Marciaz Maldanado is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND The Court issued its First Screening Order on September 14, 2023. (Doc. 9.) The Court found Plaintiff’s complaint violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 4-7.) Plaintiff was given 21 days within which to file an amended complaint, or, alternatively, to file a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.