(HC) Khademi v. Immigration and Naturalization Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20232:23-cv-01884California863 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-1884 TLN DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER IMMIGRATION AND

NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

14 Respondent.

16 Petitioner, who is incarcerated at the South Placer County Jail, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pro se habeas corpus petitions are to be liberally construed. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). The court must dismiss a petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to relief." Rule 4, Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.