Guibord

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:19-cv-0416 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS al., 15 Defendants.

17 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times and plaintiff was advised of this requirement. (See ECF No 3 at 2.) Plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address prevents this case from moving forward and warrants dismissal for failure to prosecute. The court weighs five factors in…