Prasad

(PS) Ram v. Prasad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20232:23-cv-02168California1,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANESH RAM, No. 2:23-cv-02168 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER and CHRISTINA PRASAD, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 15 On October 2, 2023, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned has reviewed the complaint and issued an order for plaintiff to show cause why this court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff filed a response, which consists of copies of a text message exchange between himself another individual, and which contains his sensitive banking information. ECF No. 6. Because of the contents of the document, the Clerk of Court is ORDERED to SEAL the filing at ECF No. 6. Because the filing does nothing to establish federal jurisdiction, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be dismissed with prejudice for lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.