(PC) Clouse v. Amador County Jail Medical

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20232:23-cv-00671California2,788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRETT THOMAS CLOUSE, No. 2:23-cv-0671 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMADOR COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he received inadequate medical care while incarcerated at Amador County Jail in 2021. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint (ECF No. 1) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will direct plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERS Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) However, plaintiff has not filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.