Goodwin

Goodwin v. City Attorney's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20231:23-cv-00347California678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUCHUN LAFRE GOODWIN, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-0347 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING PART THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., ) THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 11) )

Plaintiff seeks to hold the defendants liable for a violation of “The Fair Housing Act – sections 102 and 103 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.” (Doc. 1 at 4.) On August 3, 2023, the magistrate judge reviewed the factual allegations in the complaint and found Plaintiff failed to state a claim for a violation of the Fair Housing Act or discrimination under Sections 102 and 103 Civil Rights Act. (Doc. 10 at 2-4.) Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his complaint. (Id. at 5.) However, on August 7, 2023, prior mail from the Court was returned as undeliverable. On September 12, 2023, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.