(HC) Selck v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20232:21-cv-01499California1,142 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:21-CV-1499-DAD-DMC-P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court is Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss Petitioner’s third amended petition. ECF No. 32. Petitioner’s third amended petition states a request for relief from a first-degree burglary conviction in Sacramento County Superior Court Case number 17FE06211. ECF No. 30 at 1. Petitioner apparently means to seek relief from his first-degree burglary conviction in Sacramento County Superior Court Case number 17FE002343— case number 17FE06211 charged Petitioner with crimes other than burglary and was ultimately dismissed. ECF No. 32 at 2; See ECF No. 18. Petitioner seeks habeas relief for the “[v]acating of sentence and plea withdraw after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.