Hlaing

(PC) Hill v. Hlaing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20232:22-cv-00357California1,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:22-CV-0357-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MIN HLAING, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss, which argues for dismissal based on Plaintiff concealing funds on his application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 46. Plaintiff did not file an opposition. Because Plaintiff provided false information on his application despite having extensive litigation experience and because Plaintiff failed to account for his finances when given the opportunity to do so, the Court recommends that Defendant’s motion be granted. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Plaintiff filed his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.