Escobedo

Escobedo v. Vang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20231:23-cv-00207California4,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ESCOBEDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00207-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 22) CHENG VANG dba SUSHIYAKI, et al., FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 On August 22, 2023, Plaintiff Jose Escobedo (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant motion for default judgment against the remaining defendants in this action, Cheng Vang dba Sushiyaki and Tou Pao Yang dba Sushiyaki1 (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 22.) No opposition has been filed, and the time in which to do so has passed. L.R. 230(c). The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and vacated the hearing set for October 6, 2023. /// /// 27 1 Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Defendants Ying Vang and Maytia Vang from this action. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.