Bruce

(PC) Alexander-Campos v. Bruce

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20231:22-cv-00958California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT J. ALEXANDER-CAMPOS, III, Case No. 1:22-cv-00958-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 18) BRUCE, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Robert J. Alexander-Campos was a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On June 6, 2022, Plaintiff initiated this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (Doc. 1.) The District Court screened the complaint and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. (Doc. 6 at 2.) The court advised: “Because an amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint, plaintiff must include in it all the claims he wishes to present. . . . He may not incorporate material from the original complaint by reference.” (Id. at 2–3) (citing Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992)). On July 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint asserting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.