Daram

(PC) Cox v. Daram

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20232:21-cv-01778California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., No. 2:21-cv-01778-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. AMENDED ORDER VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion in which he correctly noted that a portion of the Court’s September 26, 2023 order could be misconstrued as a determination that Plaintiff had accrued three strikes when the Court had not reached that conclusion. Accordingly, the Court vacates the prior order and issues this amended order. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 14, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.