(PC) Giles v. Sacramento County D. A.'s Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20232:23-cv-01334California1,966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER GILES, No. 2:23-cv-1334 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate, proceeding pro se. On September 27, 2023, plaintiff was granted the option of voluntarily dismissing this action or filing an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Ruling on his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was deferred. On October 4, 2023, plaintiff elected to file an amended complaint, which is before the court. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.