Nance

Nance v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20232:23-cv-02357California355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIFFENY NANCE, Case No. 23-cv-03345-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE TRANSFER

v.

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Tiffeny Nance alleges labor law violations against her employer, defendants Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Ryder System, Inc. (Ryder), under California’s Private Attorneys’ General Act (PAGA). Dkt. No. 1 at 2. She previously filed a putative class action based on the same conduct in the Eastern District of California. Ryder has filed a motion to transfer venue to the Eastern District under 28 United States Code section 1404(a), and the first-to- file rule, Dkt. No. 13, which Nance opposes in favor of a remand to state court, Dkt. Nos. 16, 15. Transfer is ordered to the Eastern District of California. There is no dispute that all of the events giving rise to the complaint took place in the Eastern District, and that witnesses, documents, and other evidence are primarily located there. Nance agrees that venue is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.