(PS)Douglas

(PS)Douglas v. Walt Disney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20232:23-cv-02328California1,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANJON MAREQUIS DOUGLAS, No. 2:23-cv-2328 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND WALT DISNEY 20th CENTURY FOX FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

STUDIOS,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). ECF No. 2. The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be GRANTED. I. SCREENING The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether or not the complaint is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.