Pantoja
(PC) Blair v. Pantoja
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS QUINN BLAIR, JR., No. 1:23-cv-00574-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION L. PANTOJA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendant. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 14, 15) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 14, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and found that he stated cognizable a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Pantoja, Barcena, and the unidentified “Doe” officers, and a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants Ybarra, Gentry and Gaines. (ECF No. 14.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the…