Pantoja

(PC) Blair v. Pantoja

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20231:23-cv-00574California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS QUINN BLAIR, JR., No. 1:23-cv-00574-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION L. PANTOJA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

Defendant. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 14, 15) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 14, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, and found that he stated cognizable a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Pantoja, Barcena, and the unidentified “Doe” officers, and a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants Ybarra, Gentry and Gaines. (ECF No. 14.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.