(PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20232:22-cv-01920California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIXTO CRUZ MURILLO, Case No. 2:22-cv-01920-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS MATTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al.¸ FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDERS

16 ECF No. 24

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 19 On July 13, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that his complaint did not state cognizable claims. ECF No. 21. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. Plaintiff filed a response requesting that the court return all his filings and stated that the court could dismiss this action since he was going to be paroled soon. ECF No. 23. Out of an abundance of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.