(SS) Peach v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20232:23-cv-00583California393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245 Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 4 Social Security Administration

MICHAEL J. MULLEN, WSBN 54288

Special Assistant United States Attorney 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 7 Telephone: (206) 615-2748 E-Mail: michael.j.mullen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ) Case No.: 2:23-cv-00583-KJN KATHERINE E. PEACH, ) ) STIPULATION FOR REMAND; ORDER Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) )

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, )

Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) Defendant.

19 The parties, through their respective counsel, STIPULATE to the following matters. The 20 Commissioner’s final decision shall be reversed and remanded for further administrative 21 proceedings before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). On remand, the ALJ shall: offer 22 Plaintiff the opportunity for a new administrative hearing; further develop…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.