Cox
(PC) Bailey v. Cox
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY BAILEY, No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED, AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND BE
T. COX, et al., DENIED Defendants. (ECF Nos. 36, ) 16 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed May 25, 2023. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against defendants Zaragoza, Cox, Ramos Jr. (incorrectly identified by Plaintiff as Rumnos), Gunn, Mendez, and Mejia, and the sexual assault claim against defendant Mejia. On May 25, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss…