(PS) Zamudio v. FMC Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20232:16-cv-02693California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ZAMUDIO and SOLEDAD No. 2:16-cv-2693 DAD DB PS

ZAMUDIO,

12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. FMC CORPORATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiffs Raul Zamudio and Soledad Zamudio are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 6, 2023, defendant filed a request for dismissal of this action with prejudice asserting that the parties have “reached a full and final settlement of all claims[.]” (ECF No. 108 at 1.) Attached to defendant’s request was a copy of a signed settlement agreement between the parties. (Id. at 4-13.) On September 7, 2023, the undersigned issued an order, ordering plaintiffs to file an opposition to defendant’s request to dismiss, if any, within fourteen days. (ECF No. 109.) The fourteen-day period has passed and neither plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant’s request. //// //// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.