(HC) Calzada v. B.M. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20231:22-cv-01471California841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN CALZADA, No. 1:22-cv-01471-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO

SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

v.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

14 B.M. TRATE, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner Martin Calzada (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on November 14, 2022, while he was incarcerated at United States Penitentiary (“USP”) Atwater, located in Merced County, California, which is within the venue and jurisdiction of this Court. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). The Petition claims the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) “failed to timely calculate and apply First Step Act (FSA) Earned Time Credits (ETC) which is holding petitioner’s transfer to home confinement or halfway house under pertinent authorities and policies. If and when the BOP properly applies all earned FSA credits through the present, petitioner’s date should move up substantially and be eligible for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.