Peete
(PC) Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento v. Peete
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEVLIN JAMAN PEETE, Case No. 2:23-cv-01619-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this against the State of California, State of California Sacramento Superior Court, and Judge Tami R. Bogert. ECF No. 1. While plaintiff styles his pleading as an action removed from Sacramento Superior Court, it appears that this pleading may not have been first filed in state court. In any event, the allegations in the complaint are insufficient to proceed. I will give plaintiff one opportunity to file an amended complaint before recommending that this action be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint…