Campbell

(PC) Martinez v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20231:22-cv-01549California496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, No. 1:22-cv-01549-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND

v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al. (ECF Nos. 20, 21) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, filed October 23, 2023. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff also submitted a proposed second amended complaint which was lodged by the Court. (ECF No. 21.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party's pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party, and leave shall be freely given with justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.