(PC) Witt v. Solano County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20232:23-cv-00288California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY JAMAL WITT, No. 2:23-cv-0288 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO CUSTODY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate. On February 17, 2023, an order was served on plaintiff at his address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.