Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALVADOR GARCIA, JR., No. 2:23-cv-00899-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ET AL. Defendants. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 12) and determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). The court vacated the initial scheduling conference set for September 26, 2023, and hereby issues this scheduling order. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendants have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS Plaintiff anticipates the…