Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-01515-KJM-AC Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Global Aerospace, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 This is a long-running insurance coverage dispute. See, e.g., Order (Sept. 30, 2022), ECF No. 317. It was prolonged for several years by defendant Global Aerospace Inc.’s refusals to 20 produce evidence in response to requests from plaintiff Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. See id. at 1-2. The root of the disagreement was Global’s assertion of attorney-client privilege and work-product 22 protections. See id. at 2-5. The Magistrate Judge has determined the disputed evidence is not 23 protected by the attorney—client privilege or work product doctrine, and this court has denied 24 Global’s repeated requests to revisit that decision. See generally, e.g., Order (Sept. 24, 2019), ECF No. 233; Order (Jan. 14, 2021), ECF No. 277; Order (Jan. 4, 2022), ECF No. 295; Order (Sept. 30,…