(PS) Stevens v. County of Neveda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20232:23-cv-01830California2,659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERAMY MICHAEL STEVENS, No. 2:23-cv-01830-KJM-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF NEVADA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, Jeramy Michael Stevens, proceeds without counsel1 and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the court for screening and plaintiff requests to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the request is granted. For the reasons set forth below, the court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims to the extent they are based on a theory that the state superior court made incorrect rulings in civil cases that violated his rights. Otherwise, the complaint fails to state a claim, but plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. //// 27 1 Because plaintiff proceeds without counsel, this action is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.