Warden

(HC) Santa Cruz v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20232:23-cv-00940California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENIO ZARAGOZA SANTA CRUZ, No. 2:23-cv-0940 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND WARDEN, U.S.P. LOMPOC, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 On August 18, 2023, petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas was dismissed with leave to amend. Petitioner was warned the failure to file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time provided to petitioner to file an amended petition has expired and petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.