Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of CA v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20232:21-cv-02284California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF No. 2:21-cv-02284-ADA-SKO MAIDU INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., a federally recognized Indian Tribe, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATION FOR FINDING OF FAILURE

Plaintiff, TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH BY

STATE DEFENDANTS UNDER 25 U.S.C. §

v. 2710(d)(7)(B)(iii) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NEWSOME, as Governor of the State of PROCEED TO REMEDIAL PROCESS California; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, PURSUANT TO 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(B)(iii)-(vii) Defendants. (ECF No. 39)

19 On December 12, 2021, Plaintiff, Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California, filed a complaint alleging that Defendant State of California had violated the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”) by failing to negotiate with Plaintiff in good faith to enter a Tribal-State compact governing the conduct of Class III gaming activities on the Indian lands within Plaintiff’s jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1 at ¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.