(PS) Chapa v. Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20232:23-cv-01565California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA M. CHAPA, No. 2:23-cv-01565-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. NATOMAS PARK MASTER

ASSOCIATION BOARD OF

DIRECTORS, ET AL, Defendants. 17 On July 27, 2023, plaintiff Alexandra M. Chapa, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against defendants Natomas Park Master Association Board of Directors; Levy, Erlander & Company LLP; Lyon Real Estate–Natomas; and Victoria Janns. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons below, the undersigned recommends that this case be dismissed, without prejudice, because of plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. I. Background Plaintiff filed this action without having submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or payment of the $402 filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On August 3, 2023, the court directed plaintiff to file a motion for in forma pauperis or pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.