Sherman

(PC) Denham v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20231:20-cv-01645California643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL JOHN DENHAM, No. 1:20-cv-01645-ADA-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

STEWART SHERMAN, et al., (ECF No. 47) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Paul John Denham, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action with attendant state law claims in Sacramento Superior Court on September 21, 2020. (See ECF No. 1 at 2.) Defendants removed the case to federal court on November 13, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On March 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which the Magistrate Judge denied as moot because Defendants had already paid the filing fee in this action. (ECF Nos. 40, 43.) Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration on April 17, 2023. (ECF No. 47.) In his motion, Plaintiff states that he has sent several documents, including two motions for appointment of counsel, to the Clerk’s office that have not ended up on the docket. (Id. at 2.) He believes this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.