Tonzip Maritime Ltd. v. Coral Energy Pte. Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20232:23-cv-02283California2,374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONZIP MARITIME LTD., No. 2:23-cv-02283-DJC-AC

Plaintiff, v. ORDER

CORAL ENERGY PTE. LTD.,

14 Defendant, 15 and

ING BANK N.V.,

17 Garnishee.

Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Tonzip Maritime Ltd.’s renewed ex parte

application for an order authorizing issuance of process of maritime attachment and

garnishment. (Re newed Appl. Maritime Attach. (ECF No. 12).) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES this renewed application. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for a writ of maritime attachment and garnishment on October 10, 2023, seeking to attach Defendant Coral Energy Pte. Ltd.’s bank accounts allegedly held by Garnishee ING Bank N.V. in the Eastern District of California (“District”). (See generally Appl. Maritime Attach. (ECF No. 5).) Plaintiff sought attachment of Defendant’s assets in order to secure its claims brought against

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.