Tonzip Maritime Ltd. v. Coral Energy Pte. Ltd.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20232:23-cv-02283California2,374 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TONZIP MARITIME LTD., No. 2:23-cv-02283-DJC-AC
Plaintiff, v. ORDER
CORAL ENERGY PTE. LTD.,
14 Defendant, 15 and
ING BANK N.V.,
17 Garnishee.
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Tonzip Maritime Ltd.’s renewed ex parte
application for an order authorizing issuance of process of maritime attachment and
garnishment. (Re newed Appl. Maritime Attach. (ECF No. 12).) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES this renewed application. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for a writ of maritime attachment and garnishment on October 10, 2023, seeking to attach Defendant Coral Energy Pte. Ltd.’s bank accounts allegedly held by Garnishee ING Bank N.V. in the Eastern District of California (“District”). (See generally Appl. Maritime Attach. (ECF No. 5).) Plaintiff sought attachment of Defendant’s assets in order to secure its claims brought against