Johnson v. Rush Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20231:19-cv-00105California573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 WILLIAM LEE JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00105-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE B & N v. TRUCKING, INC. AS A PARTY IN THIS ACTION CARLETON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS, DEEMING

COMPLAINT AMENDED

17 (ECF No. 119) 18 On October 25, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation whereby all parties agreed, pursuant 19 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that: (1) Plaintiff, B & N Trucking, Inc., may 20 be dismissed without prejudice from the First Amended Complaint, each party to bear their own 21 fees and costs; and (2) Plaintiffs’ Sixth Claim for Relief (Negligent Hiring, Training and/or 22 Supervision) of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint may be dismissed without prejudice, each 23 party to bear their own fees and costs. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.