(PS) Robb v. California Air Resources Board

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LYNETTE ROBB, No. 2:23-cv-1013 DJC DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD; LIANE M. RUDOLPH, in her official capacity, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Lynette Robb is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s amended complaint styled as a “Petition for Writ of Mandate” and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 2 & 5.) Plaintiff seeks an order vacating the California Air Resources Board’s “adoption” of “the Advanced Clean Cars II regulation . . . beginning in 2035.” (Am. Pet. (ECF No. 5) at 2.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s application…