(PC)Trehearne

(PC)Trehearne v. Amador County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20232:22-cv-00254California1,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS TREHEARNE, No. 2:22-cv-00254 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AMADOR COUNTY, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former1 county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he was deprived outdoor exercise in violation of his constitutional rights. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). I. Background Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of the complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Upon screening, the undersigned determined the complaint stated a potentially cognizable claim for denial of his right to outdoor exercise against Amador County. (ECF No. 5.) Following service, 1 Review of the Amador County inmate locator website indicates that plaintiff is no longer in custody. The court may take judicial notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.