(PC) Kamilchu v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20232:21-cv-02245California2,041 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARD KAMILCHU, No. 2:21-cv-02245 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time to file a third amended complaint (ECF No. 21), which includes a request to appoint counsel should the court deny the motion, and his motion to seal “any attachments, exhibits, or filings containing health information” (ECF No. 22). For the reasons stated below, the court will grant in part and deny in part the motion for extension of time, and deny the motion to seal. I. Background On June 24, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 17) with leave to amend because it did not state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.