(PC) Kern v. Sacramento County Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20232:23-cv-00252California2,374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES KERN, No. 2:23-cv-0252 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a county prisoner proceeding pro se. Currently before the court is plaintiff’s 18 first amended complaint. ECF No. 11.

I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

20 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a 21 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 22 The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are 23 “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] 24 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 25 A claim “is [legally] frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” 26 Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th 27 Cir. 1984).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.