Francis

(PC) Sekona v. Francis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20231:19-cv-00529California1,600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ETUATE SEKONA Case No. 1:19-cv-00529-ADA-HBK

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER1

M. FRANCIS, (Doc. No. 114)

Defendant. FOURTEEN DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed on October 12, 2023. (Doc. No. 114, “Motion”). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends Plaintiff’s Motion be denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner confined within the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), is proceeding on his pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff’s case is currently set for trial on his remaining Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claim against Defendant M. Francis. (See generally docket). Although…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.